Multi-aspect analysis of flint materials from Suchodółka, site 3, the świętokrzyskie voivodeship
2011, 50, Tom 50, Nr B
State Archaeological Museum in Warsaw
University of Warsaw, Faculty of Archaeology
State Archaeological Museum in Warsaw
University of Warsaw, Faculty of Archaeology
DOI
Data publikacji
Model publikowania
Rodzaj licencji
Dziedzina
Dyscyplina
Język publikacji
Pliki do pobrania
PDF 7 MB
Liczba wyświetleń:42
Liczba pobrań:14
Cytowania Crossref:0
Wynik Altmetric:0
Abstrakt
the objective of the presented work is to characterise technological processes of lithic production on the basis of flint material obtained from Suchodółka, Site 3 located on the north edge of the Sandomierz upland. the applied research methodology isacombination of debitage refitting (used for the technology reconstruction) with the microscopic analysis of traces on the surface of waste material produced during the lithic reduction. accordingly, we shall tacklethe problem of identifying specifictypes of raw material utilised at the site in relation to its treatment in prehistory. the spatial distribution analysis was employed to reveal the organisation of the site in respect to various functional areas. the analysed assemblage was excavated from two trenches(26 m2) wherethelithicconcentration originating from the late Palaeolithic Period was discovered. the most numerous group of excavated products was composed of debitage – 280 pieces. the material consisted mostly of blades, flakes from preparation, platform spalls,crested blades and cores. a few tool forms were noted. the tool forms were limited to a dihedral burin, a tanged point, a fragment of a perforator (fig. 1:1–3) and single retouched blades. the majority of these materials are characteristic for the Swiderian culture (SchilD 197; SzyMczaK 2000). the flint material was deposited in afallow sand soil, from 0 to 70 cm below the ground. the relics were found in a concentrated form despite the geological conditions, which impeded their deposition in an intact space arrangement.
Bibliografia
Ataman K.1989 A Functional Study of the Upsilon Blade Tools from Hayaz Höyük, “anatolica” 16, 197–207.
Byrne l., Olle A., Vergès J.M.2006 Under the Hammer: Residues Resulting from Production and Microwear on Experimental Stone Tools,“archaeometry” 8/, 9–6.
Dziewanowski M.2006 Flint Assemblage Dręstwo 37. A Preliminary Analysis of Predetermined Swiderian Debitage, (in:)a. Wiśniewski, t. Płonka, J. Burdukiewicz (eds.), The Stone: Technique and Technology, Wrocław, 19–166.
Fiedorczuk J.2006 Final Paleolithic Camp Organization as Seen from the Perspective of Lithic Artifacts Refitting, Warszawa.
Ginter B.1974 Wydobywanie, przetwórstwo i dystrybucja surowców i wyrobów krzemiennych w schyłkowym paleolicie północnejczęści europy środkowej, “Przegląd archeologiczny” 22, –122.
Ginter B., Kozłowski J.K.1975 Technika obróbki i typologia wyrobów kamiennych paleolitu i mezolitu, Kraków.
Ibáñez J.J. et al.1990 J.J. ibáñez, J.e. Gonzáles, M.a. lagüera, c. Gutièrrez, Knapping Traces: Their Characteristics According to theHammerstone and the Technique Used, (in:) R. Séronie-Vivien, M. lenoir (eds.), Le silex de sa genèse á l’outil. Actes du Ve Colloque International sur le Silex, 1987, cahiers du Quaternaire 17, 547–553.
Inizan M.l., Roche H., Tixier J.1992 Technology of Knapped Stone, Meudon.
Keeley l.H.1980 Experimental Determination of Stone Tool Uses. A Microwear Analysis, chicago.
Méry S. et al.2007 S. Méry, P. anderson, M.-l. inizan, M. lechevallier, J. Pelegrin, A Pottery Workshop with Flint Tools on BladesKnapped with Copper at Nausharo (Indus Civilisation, ca. 2500 BC), “Journal of archaeological Science” 3,1098–1116.
Migal W.2007 On Preferential Points of the Final Paleolithic in the Central European Lowland, (in:) M. Kobusiewicz,J. Kabaciński (eds.), Studies in the Final Paleolithic Settlement of the Great European Plain, 18–200.
Pelegrin J.2000 Les techniques de débitage laminaire au Tardiglaciaire: critères de diagnose et quelques réflexions, (in:)t. Valentin, P. Bodu, M. christensen (eds.), L’Europe centrale et septentrionale au Tardiglaciaire. Confrontation des modèles régionaux de peuplement, Actes de la table-ronde de Nemours, mai 1997, Apraif. Mémoiredu Musée de Préhistoire d’Île-de-France 7, nemours, 73–86.
Przeździecki M.2002 Schyłkowopaleolityczna pracownia krzemieniarska z wykopu „Jabłoń”, na stanowisku Wołkusz 5, gm. Lipskn/Biebrzą, woj. podlaskie, w świetle metody składanek, Warszawa (M.a. typescript in ia uW).
Schild R. 1969 Próba ustalenia list form związanych z procesem przygotowania obłupni i rdzeniowaniem w cyklumazowszańskim, (in:) R. Jamka (ed.), III Sympozjum paleolityczne, vol. 2: Dyskusja, Kraków, 3–1.
Schild R. 1975 Późny paleolit, (in:) W. chmielewski, W. hensel (eds.), Prahistoria ziem polskich, vol. i: Paleolit i mezolit,Wrocław – Warszawa – Kraków – Gdańsk, 19–338.
Szymczak K.2000 Late Glacial in Poland – Culture Differentiation, (in:) t. Valentin, P. Bodu, M. christensen (eds.), L’Europecentrale et septentrionale au Tardiglaciaire. Confrontation des modèles régionaux de peuplement, Actes de latable-ronde de Nemours, mai 1997, aPRaiF. Mémoire du Musée de Préhistoire d’Île-de-France 7, nemours,273–286.
Vaughan P.C.1985 Use-Wear Analysis of Flaked Stone Tools, tucson.
Wilke P.J., Quintero l.A.1994 Naviform Core-and-Blade Technology: Assemblage Character as Determined by Replicative Experiments, (in:)h.G. Gebel, S.K. Kozłowski (eds.), Neolithic Chipped Stone Industries of the Fertile Crescent, Berlin, 33–60.