A problem of the bullet shaped cores : a global perspective
2002, 45, Tom 45, Nr B
University of Warsaw, Faculty of Archaeology
DOI
Publication date
Publishing model
License type
Field
Discipline
Language of publication
Downloads
PDF 12 MB
Number of views:124
Number of downloads:15
Crossref citations:0
Altmetric score:0
Abstract
Summarizing the First Workshop on PPN Chipped Lithic Industries, held in Berlin, 29th of March - 2nd of April, 1993, S.K. Kozłowski and H.G. Gebel had proposed to divide a region of the Fertile Crescent into two main techno-taxonomical provinces: the eastern, comprising the piedmont of the Zagros together with adjacent lowlands, and the western, Levantinian one (KOZŁOWSKI, GEBEL 1994). The authors called these provinces: the eastern and the western wing of the Fertile Crescent. The most important difference between the lithic assemblages of these two provinces is the presence of the macrolithic tanged points and the naviform, double striking platform cores in the assemblages of the western wing and the willow-leaf or rhomboid (lozenge) shaped arrowheads accompanied by relatively numerous microliths and the bullet shaped (conical) cores in the assemblages of the eastern wing. In later works the western industries were called the Big Arrwoheads Industries (BAI; cf. AURENCHE, KOZŁOWSKI 1999, p. 61, tableau chronologique). Analysing this situation F. Hole (1996, p. 6-7) pointed out that the BAI single headed arrows are directly connected with an open steppe zone, while the microliths appear mainly in the upland regions, which could reflect the different hunting strategies. The same author (HOLE 1996, p. 7) suggests that the microlithic and bullet shaped core processing tradition generally should be confined to the mountainous regions, probably of Caucasus or Northern Zagros/ Taurus. Beliving that microlitization of stone tools in this region has a particulary long tradition reaching even Mousterian (HOLE 1970) through the Epipalaeolithic, he supposes, after M. L. Inizan (1985) that "the conical blade cores (... ) seem to have their earliest manifestation in Asia, implying that the technique of pressure flaking may have moved from east to west across the central Asian steppe". O. Bar-Yosef (1996, p. 208) is of an opinion that bullet shaped core technique has rather local, Caucasian origins. A useful definition of "bullet shaped core" was given by P.J. Wilke (1996, p. 289-290). "The term 'bullet shaped'", writes he, "refers to very regular and symmetrical cores of rather small size that are nearly parallelsided and of elongate conical form, and that were reduced around their entire perimeters". Other synonymous names for such cores also met in the archaeological texts are: "conical cores", "pyramidal cores" or, mainly in Russian literature, "pencil-like cores" ("karandashevidniye nukleusi"). Very important is further remark of P.J. Wilke: "It should be recognized at the outset, however, that through extensive reduction, larger prismatic-blade cores can grade gradually and imperceptibly into small, exhausted, bullet-shaped cores. The term 'bullet shaped' is thus rather arbitrary with respect to core size, and, to a certain extent, even to form". It would mean that we should not treat bullet shaped cores as a separate class, but rather as one of the phases of a successful application of a certain core reduction technique (cf. also WILKE 1996, p. 303, Fig. 2). Thus, to the same technical category should be also included the cores discarded in other phases of processing, such as prismatic ones, bearing exceptionally regular blade or bladelet negatives on their surfaces. Such cores could potentially turn into the bullet shaped ones if only their further processing could be continued. In this context an expression "bullet shaped" must be considered only as a signal word, covering in fact much wider category of core morphological classes (cf. also HILDEBRAND 1996, p. 195). With bullet shaped cores an application of pressure-blade technology is closely associated (INIZAN 1985, WILKE 1996, p. 291). Especially the cores with an angle between a platform and a surface close to the right one are highly possible to be worked with the use of pressure technique (PELLEGRIN 1984, WILKE 1996, p. 301). It cannot be forgotten than, that when we discuss the problems concerning bullet shape cores, such as their origins or distribution, at the same time we also have in mind the problems of the origins or distribution of the pressure technique. The maps showing distribution of the PPN flint assemblages with a significant share ofbullet shaped cores in the Near East were elaborated by several authors (INIZAN, LECHEVALLIER, 1994, p. 24, Fig. 1, WILKE 1996, Fig. 1). As we have said above, such assemblages appear nearly exclusively East of Tigris River, and perfectly mark a borderline between the eastern and the western wing of the Fertile Crescent. For some assemblages the specific figures of bullet shaped cores representation could be given: Ali Kosh - less than 90%, Asiab - 54.1%, Karim Shahir - 39.1% (HILDEBRAND 1996, p. 200, Table 2), Nemrik 9 - ca 50% (KOZŁOWSKI, SZYMCZAK 1990, p. 64, 71, Table A, see also fig. 1). After analysing the dates from Ali Kosh (C1 and C2 - 9.500-8.700 BP, B1 - 8.700-8.000 BP, A1 - 8.000 -7.600 BP), Asiab (9.755 ±85 BP), Karim Shahir (ca 10.850-10.550 BP) and Pa Sangar (older than 12.000 BP - with no bullet shaped cores present), E. A. Hildebrand (1996, p. 200, Table 2) concluded that the pressure technique must had appeared in Zagros region between 12.000 and ca 10.500 BP, to expand gradually during the following millenia (note that all 14C dates mentioned in this paper are given in conventional - uncalibrated - years BP). E. A. Hildebrand's opinion seems to stay in quite a good accordance with the chronological results from Nemrik 9, where the oldest series of 14C dates, which could be considered as probable, indicates the first half of the 12th millenium BP (PAZDUR 1992, p. 116, Table 1/VI). However, such an early chronology becames doubtful, if we have taken into account the results obtained in the M'lefaat site, where a share of bullet shaped cores is also significant (KOZŁOWSKI 1998, p. 196-197, Figs. 13, 14). The charcoal samples elaborated in the Gliwice Laboratory gave four dates between 14.000 and 12.000 BP, and another four between 11.000 and 9.500 BP (KOZŁOWSKI 1998, p. 188, Fig. 4). Yet, the repeated dates from the wet sieved botanical samples sent for the accelerator dating to the Oxford 14C Laboratory gave considerably younger results: 9.890 ±120 BP, 9.870 ±140 BP, 9.680 ±100 BP and 9.660 ±250 BP (KOZŁOWSKI 1998, p. 189). S.K. Kozłowski (1994; 1998, p. 189) is of an opinion that "ageing" is a general problem of the dates obtained from the Near Eastern charcoal samples: "Dates clearly earlier than could be expected are frequently being obtained from MiddleEastern sediments", writes he. According to the same author the accelerator dates from M'lefaat correspond with phase II in Nemrik, dated before to 11.300 ±200, 11.180 ±90 and 10.900 ±140 BP (PAZDUR 1992) and phase IIIA in Murreybet, dated to 11.150-10.950 BP (AURENCHE, KOZłOWSKI 1999, p. 178). Thus, if we introduced to our discussion a general "ageing correction", we would have to agree that the beginnings of a bullet shaped cores reduction with the use ofpressure technique should be dated to the first half of the 10th millenium BP, which is, as we will see below, not significantly earlier than in other cultural units of Eurasia. The maps presented by M.L. Inizan and M. Lechevallier (1994, p. 24, Fig. 1), F. Hole (1994, p. 332, Fig. 1), P.J. Wilke (1996, p. 291, Fig. 1) or O. Aurenche and S.K. Kozłowski (1999, p. 54, Fig. 7) show that the PPN sites with bullet shaped cores in the East reach only the western parts of the Iranian Plateau (Ganj Dareh, Abdoul Hossein), and do not cross a zone of the salty deserts. M.L. Inizan and M. Lechevallier (1994, p. 24, fig. 1) mark the single sites with pressure technique as far as in Afganistan and Pakistan. Yet, such a picture of distribution of the bullet shaped cores in the Early Holocene of the Old World is far incomplete. Besides some contributory papers discussing an occurrance of pressure technique in particular regions (INIZAN, LECHEVALLIER 1990; INIZAN, LECHEVALLIER, PLUMET 1992) we do not find any publication presenting a discussed phenomenon in whole. In this paper we would like to widen a view on this problem and show it in a global perspective, even though such an approach have brought us much more new questions than answers.
Bibliography
AURENCHE O., KOZŁOWSKI S.K. 1999 La naissance du Neolithique au Proche Orient, Paris
BADER N. O., TSERETELI L.D. 1989 Mezolit Kavkaza, [in:] Mezolit SSSR, L.V. Koltsov, ed., Moskva, p. 93-105
BAR-YOSEF O. 1996 Late Pleistocene Lithic Traditions in the Near East and their Expressions in Early Neolithic Assemblages, [in:] Neolithic Chipped Stone Industries of the Fertile Crescent and Their Contemporaries in Adjacent Regions, S.K. Kozłowski and H.G. Gebel, eds, Berlin p. 207-216
BESPROZVANNIY E.M., MOSIN V.S. 1996 Kkharaktieristikie mezolita Yuzhnogo Zauralia, [in:] Novoe v arkheologii Yuzhnogo Urala, S.A. Grigoriev, ed., Tchelabinsk, p. 18-47
BIZHANOV E. B. 1982 Mezolititcheskiye i neolititcheskiye pamiatniki Severo-Zapadnogo Ustiurta, [in:] Arkheologia Priaralya, vip. 1, Tashkent
BRUNET F. 1999 La neolithisation en Asie Centrale: un etet de la question, „Paleorient", vol. 24/2, p. 27-48
BRUNET F. 2002 De l'epipaleolithique au neolithique en Asie Centrale: quelle neolithisation? Synthese critique des donnees et etude technologique d'industries lithiques, PhD thesis prepared on Universite de Paris I under direction of Prof. N. Pigeot
BRZOZOWSKI J., SIEMASZKO J. 1996 Dolnomezolityczne obozowisko kultury kundajskiej w Miłukach, stanowisko 4, w świetle datowań dendrochronologicznych i radiowęglowych, „Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej", No. 1331, MatematykaFizyka, z. 80, Geochronometria 14, p. 231-238
BUROV G.M. 1999 "Postsviderian" of the European North East, [in:] Tanged Points Cultures in Europe, S.K. Kozłowski, J. Gurba, L.L. Zaliznyak, eds, Lublin, p. 281-291
BUTRIMAS A., OSTRAUSKAS T. 1999 Tanged Points Cultures in Lithuania, [in:] Tanged Points Cultures in Europe, S.K. Kozłowski, J. Gurba, L.L. Zaliznyak, eds, Lublin, p. 267-271
DOLUKHANOV P.M. 1986 Foragers and farmers in West-Central Asia, [in:] Hunters in Transition. Mesolithic Societies of Temperate Eurasia and Their Transition to Farming, M. Zvelebil, ed., Cambridge-London-New York-New Rochelle-Melburne-Sydney, p. 121-132
DZHURAKULOV M.D., KHOLMATOV N.U. 1991 Mezolit i neolit Średniego Zaravshana,, Tashkent
FORMOZOV A.A 1963 Obzor issledovaniy mezolititcheskikh stoyanok na Kavkazie, "Sovietskaya Arkheologiya", No. 4
GORELIK A.F. 1984 Mezolit Severo-Vostotchnogo Pritchernomoria, [in:] Matieriali kamiennogo vieka na territorii Ukraini, Kiev, p. 4-23
GORELIK A.F. 1987 Novie mezolititcheskiye pamiatniki s yanislavitskimi vkladishevimi elementami na Severskom Dontse, "Sovietskaya Arkheologia", No. 3, p. 146-160
GURINA N.N. 1989 Mezolit Latvii i Estonii, [in:] Mezolit SSSR, L.V. Koltsov, ed., Moskva, p. 46-54
HILDEBRAND E.A.1996 Changes in Methods and Techniques of Blade Production During the Epipalaeolothic and Early Neolithic inthe Eastern Fertile Crescent, [in:] Neolithic Chipped Stone Industries of the Fertile Crescent and TheirContemporaries in Adjacent Regions, S.K. Kozłowski and H.G. Gebel, eds, Berlin, p. 193-206
HOLE F. 1970 The Palaeolithic culture sequence in western Iran, [in:] Proceedings of the VIIth International Congress of Prehistoric and Protohistoric Sciences, Prague, p. 286-292
HOLE F. 1994 Khabur Basin PPN and Early PN Industries, [in:] Neolithic Chipped Stone Industries of the Fertile Crescent, H.G. Gebel and S.K. Kozłowski, eds, Berlin, p. 331-347
HOLE F. 1996 A Syrian Bridge Between the Levant and the Zagros?, [in:] Neolithic Chipped Stone Industries of the Fertile Crescent, and Their Contemporaries in Adjacent Regions, S.K. Kozłowski and H.G. Gebel, eds, Berlin, p. 5-14
INIZAN M.L. 1985 Le debitageparpression au Moyen-Orient:premieres observations, [in:] De l'Indus aux Balkans. Recueil Jean Deshayes, J.L. Hout, ed., Paris, p. 43-54
INIZAN M.L., LECHEVALLIER M. 1990 A techno-economic approach to lithics: some examples of blade pressure debitage in the Indo-Pakistani subcontinent, [in:] South Asian Archaeology, M. Taddei, ed., Venice, p. 43-59
INIZAN M.L., LECHEVALLIER M. 1994 Ladoption du debitage laminaire par pression au Proch-Orient, [in:] Neolithic Chipped Stone Industries of the Fertile Crescent, H.G. Gebel and S.K. Kozłowski, eds, Berlin, p. 23-32
INIZAN M.L., LECHEVALLIER M., PLUMET P. 1992 A technological marker of the penetration into North America: pressure microblade debitage. Its origin in the Palaeolithic of North Asia and its diffusion, [in:] Materials Issues in Art and Archaeology 3, P.B. Vandiver, J.R. Druzik, G.S. Weeler and I.C. Freestone, eds, Pittsburgh, p. 661-676
ISLAMOV U.I., TIMOFEEV V.I. 1986 Kultura kamiennogo vieka Tsentralnoy Fergani, Tashkent
JANCEVIC A. 1999 Das Sviderien derKrim, [in:] Tanged Points Cultures in Europe, S.K. Kozłowski, J. Gurba, L.L. Zaliznyak, eds, Lublin, p. 36-46
KAPITSIN V.F. 1997 Grenskaya kultura, [in:] Arkhieologiya Belarusi, vol. I, Kamenni i bronzovi viaki, M.M. Tcharnauski, A.G. Kaletchits, eds, Minsk, p. 39-52
KAPITSIN V.F., KALETCHITS A.G. 1997 Sozhskaya kultura, [in:] Arkheologiya Belorusi, vol. I, Kamenni i bronzovi viaki, M.M. Tcharnauski, A.G. Kaletchits, eds, Minsk, p. 55-67
KOLTSOV L.V. 1989 Mezolit Severa Sibiri i Dalnego Vostoka, [in:] Mezolit SSSR, L. V. Koltsov, ed., Moskva, p. 187-194
KOLTSOV L. V., MIEDVIEDIEV G.I. 1989 Mezolit Yuga Sibiri i Dalnego Vostoka, [in:] Mezolit SSSR, L. V. Koltsov, ed., Moskva, p. 174-186
KOLTSOV L. V., ZHILIN M. G. 1999a Tanged point cultures in the Upper Volga Basin, [in:] Tanged Points Cultures in Europe, S.K. Kozłowski, J. Gurba, L.L. Zaliznyak, eds, Lublin, p. 346-360
KOLTSOV L. V., ZHILIN M. G. 1999b Mezolit Volgo-Okskogo mezhduretchia (pamiatniki butovskoi kultury), Moskva
KOROBKOVA G. F. 1969 Orudia truda i khozaystvo neolititcheskikh pliemion Sredniey Azii, Matieriali i Issledovania po Arkheologii SSSR, No. 158, Leningrad
KOROBKOVA G. F. 1989 Mezolit Sredniey Azii i Kazakhstana, [in:] Mezolit SSSR, L. V. Koltsov, ed., Moskva, p. 149-173
KOTOVITCH V. G. 1964 Kamenniy viek Dagestana, Makhatchkala
KOTOVITCH V. G.1982 Probliemi kulturno-istoritcheskogo i khoziaystviennogo razvitia naselenia drevniego Dagestana, Moskva
KOZŁOWSKI J.K., KOZŁOWSKI S.K. 1975 Pradzieje Europy od XL do IV tysiąclecia p. n. e., Warszawa
KOZŁOWSKI J.K., KOZŁOWSKI S.K. 1981 Europa do V tysiąclecia p. n. e., [in:] Ludy i kultury dawnej Europy, S. K. Kozłowski, ed., Warszawa, p. 15-70
KOZŁOWSKI S.K. 1967 Z problematyki polskiego mezolitu, część 2: o podziale chronologicznym, [in:] Materiały do prahistorii plejstocenu i wczesnego holocenu Polski, W. Chmielewski, ed., Wrocław-Warszawa-Kraków, p. 46-75
KOZŁOWSKI S.K.1971 Północno-wschodni krąg kultur mezolitycznych, [in:] Z polskich badań nad epoką kamienia, W. Chmielewski, ed., Wrocław-Warszawa-Kraków-Gdańsk, p. 27-102
KOZŁOWSKI S.K.1994 Radiocarbon dates from Aceramic Irak, [in:] Late Quaternary Chronology and Paleoclimates of the Eastern Mediterranean, O. Bar-Yosef, R.S. Kra, eds, Tuscon-Cambridge, p. 255-264
KOZŁOWSKI S.K. 1996 The Trialetian "Mesolithic" Industry of the Caucasus, Transcaspia, Eastern Anatolia, and the Iranian Plateau, [in:] Neolithic Chipped Stone Industries of the Fertile Crescent, and Their Contemporaries in Adjacent Regions, S.K. Kozłowski and H.G. Gebel, eds, Berlin, p. 161-170
KOZŁOWSKI S.K. (ed.) 1998 M'Lefaat Early Neolithic Site in Northern Irak, [in:] Cahiers de l'Euphrate 8, Paris, p. 179-273
KOZŁOWSKI S.K., GEBEL H. G. 1994 Editors' Concluding Remarks on Chipped Lithics Techno-Taxa and Interaction Spheres Throughout the 9h to 6 th Millenium BC, [in:] Neolithic Chipped Stone Industries of the Fertile Crescent, H.G. Gebel and S.K. Kozłowski, eds, Berlin, p. 595-601
KOZŁOWSKI S.K., SZYMCZAK K. 1990 Flint industry, [in:] Nemrik 9. Pre-pottery Neolithic Site in Iraq (General Report - Seasons 1985-1986), S.K. Kozłowski, ed., Warsaw, p. 59-103
MASSON V. M. 1971 Poselenye Dzheytun (probliema stanovlenia proizvodiashtchei ekonomiki), Matieriali i Issledovania po Arkheologii SSSR, No. 180, Leningrad
MATIUSHIN G. N. 1976 Mezolit Yuzhnogo Urala, Moskva
MATIUSHIN G. N. 1986 The Mesolithic and Neolithic in the southern Urals and Central Asia, [in:] Hunters in Transition. Mesolithic Societies of Temperate Eurasia and Their Transition to Farming, M. Zvelebil, ed., Cambridge-London -New York-New Rochelle-Melburne-Sydney, p. 133-150
MATIUSHIN G. N. 1989 Mezolit Yuzhnogo Zauralia, [in:] Mezolit SSSR, L.V. Koltsov, ed., Moskva, p. 144-148
MELENTEEV A.N. 1989 Mezolit Severnogo Prikaspia, [in:] Mezolit SSSR, L.V. Koltsov, ed., Moskva, p. 104-105
OSHIBKINA S.V. 1989 Mezolit tsentralnikh i severo-vostotchnikh rayonov Severa Evropeiskoi tchasti SSSR, [in:] Mezolit SSSR, L.V. Koltsov, ed., Moskva, p. 32-45
PAZDUR M.F. 1992 Radiocarbon dating of charcoal and shell samples from site Nemrik 9, [in:] Nemrik 9. Pre-pottery Neolithic Site in Iraq. Vol. 2: House No 1/1A/1B, S.K. Kozłowski, ed., Warsaw, p. 111-117
PELLEGRIN J. 1984 Approche technologique experimental de la mise en forme de la nucleus pour le debitage systematique par pression, [in:] Prehistoire de la Pierre Taillee 2, Paris, p. 93-104
STARKOV V.F. 1989 Mezolit Sredniego Priuralia, [in:] Mezolit SSSR, L.V. Koltsov, ed., Moskva, p. 125-129
SZYMCZAK K. 1995 Epoka kamienia Polski północno-wschodniej na tle środkowoeuropejskim, Warszawa
SZYMCZAK K., GRETCHKINA T. 1996 The Perspectives of the Studies on the Early Neolithic of the Kyzyl-kum Desert. Ayakagytma "The Site" and Other New Collections, [in:] Neolithic Chipped Stone Industries of the Fertile Crescent, and Their Contemporaries in Adjacent Regions, S.K. Kozłowski and H.G. Gebel, eds, Berlin, p. 105-125
SZYMCZAK K., GRETCHKINA T. (eds) 1997 Polish-Uzbek Archaeological Expedition, season 1996, General Report, Excavation in Ayakagytma The Site, SE Kyzylkum Desert, Uzbekistan, Warsaw-Samarkand (bound manuscript)
SZYMCZAK K., MUSTAFAKULOV S. (eds) 1998 Polish-Uzbek Archaeological Expedition, season 1997, General Report, Excavation in Ayakagytma The Site, SE Kyzyl-kums, Uzbekistan, Warsaw-Samarkand (bound manuscript)
SZYMCZAK K., KHUDZHANAZAROV M. (eds) 1999 Polish-Uzbek Archaeological Expedition, season 1998, General Report, Excavation in Ayakagytma The Site, SE Kyzyl-kums, Uzbekistan, Warsaw-Samarkand (bound manuscript)
SZYMCZAK K., KHUDZHANAZAROV M. (eds) 2000 Polish-Uzbek Archaeological Expedition, season 1999, General Report, Excavation in Ayakagytma The Site, SE Kyzyl-kums, Uzbekistan, Warsaw-Samarkand (bound manuscript)
SZYMCZAK K., KHUDZHANAZAROV M., FONTUGNE M., MICHNIAK R. Neolithic Flood in Central Asia? (in course of issue)
TELEGIN D. YA. 1989 Mezolit Yugo-Zapada SSSR (Ukraina i Moldaviya), [in:] Mezolit SSSR, L.V. Koltsov (ed.), Moskva, p. 106-124
VINOGRADOV A. V. 1981 Drevnie okhotniki i ribolovi Srednioazyatskogo Miezhduretchya, Trudi Khorezmskoy ArkheologoEtnografitcheskoy Ekspeditsii, vol. XIII, Moskva
WILKE P. J. 1996 Bullet-Shaped Microblade Cores of the Near Eastern Neolithic: Experimental Replicative Studies, [in:] Neolithic Chipped Stone Industries of the Fertile Crescent, and Their Contemporaries in Adjacent Regions, S. K. Kozłowski and H.G. Gebel, eds, Berlin, p. 289-310
YANEVITCH O.O. 1987 Etapi rozvitku kulturi Kukrek v Krimu, „Arkheologiya", No. 58, p. 7-18
ZALIZNIYAK L.L.1998 Pieredistoriya UkrainiX — Vtis. do n.. e., Kiev
Other articles from the issue
Znalezisko ozdób srebrnych z okresu wędrówek ludów z Oterek, koło Reszla, województwo Warmińsko-Mazurskie
Mateusz Bogucki
Góra katedralna w Chełmie jako przedmiot badań interdyscyplinarnych
Andrzej Buko
Zapinki cebulowate z cmentarzyska miejskiego w Chersonezie Taurydzkim (Sewastopol, Krym, Ukraina)
Radosław Karasiewicz-Szczypiorski, Roksana Chowaniec