March 10, 2026

Author's Guidelines

GUIDELINES FOR AUTHORS

A manuscript should be prepared according to the guidelines for authors (below). Manuscript should be submitted to the Editorial Office of ‘Światowit’ by an e-mail: swiatowit@uw.edu.pl

GUIDELINES FOR AUTHORS 

A text file should be saved in .doc/.docx format and additionally in .pdf, if it uses unusual fonts. All texts should include:

  • body of the article with its title (along with an English version of the title),
  • abstract (up to 1500 characters) in English and, if possible, Polish,
  • key words (5-10) in English and the language of the text,
  • captions for figures in English and the language of the text,
  • reference list,
  • full information on the Author(s): academic title or degree, name and surname, affiliation, and email address.

The body of the text should be typed in Times New Roman, 12 pts., with 1.5 line spacing, without formatting, highlights, or automatically-generated lists. In case special fonts are to be used in the text, e.g. for ancient languages, they should be made available to the Editorial Office.

References to illustrations in the text given in parentheses should use the language of the paper (e.g. Ryc., Fig., Abb.) with a continuous Arabic numeration. Captions for illustrations should include a description as well as state their author(s) or make a reference to the source. Each illustration should be submitted as a separate file titled according to the numeration in the text (e.g. Fig. 1) and provided in the .jpg or .tif format with resolution of at least 300 dpi for photographs, and in the .tif format with resolution of at least 600 dpi in case of drawings. Illustrations should accurately reflect the scale of the reproduced work, and the maximal dimensions of a full-size figure are 17 x 23 cm. Inserting descriptions by the use of numbers or letters referenced in captions should be avoided.

Names of archaeological sites should be accompanied with their localisation as per the administrative rules used in a given country.

In-text quotations should be marked with a quotation mark according to the rules of the language of the text. It is acceptable to put emphasis on or highlight fragments of the text with upper apostrophes, e.g. ‘oriental’ look.

Modern names and terms from foreign languages should be marked with italics, e.g. al fresco technique or Casa delle Sfere Fittili at Aghia Triada. Similarly, italics are also used for citations, terms, and expressions from ancient languages, including Latin abbreviations and terms, such as et al., in situ, infra.


Rules for Citations

Literature references should follow the modified Harvard system, but they have to be placed not in-text, but in automatically-generated footnotes, and should use a system of abbreviations explained in the reference list at the end of the article. If multiple authors are cited in the same footnote, they should be separated with a semi-colon, e.g. 

Piątkowska-Małecka, Tomek 2015, 12–14, tabs 1–3; Żuchowska 2015, 143–145, figs 1–3. 

If multiple works by the same author are referenced, it is enough to place the dates of the subsequent publications separated with a semi-colon. In case the works were published in the same year, letters of the alphabet should be added to the date, e.g. 

Madyda-Legutko1987a, 15–20; 1987b, 21–25. 

If a publication has three or more authors, it should be cited with the name of the first author followed by et al., whereas the reference list should include all the authors separated with commas, e.g. 

Tanasi D., Barone G., Mazzoleni P. 2014, A Case Study for an Archaeometric Characterisation of Sicilian Middle Bronze Age Pottery (15th –13th c. BC), Światowit XI (LII)/A (2013), 47-64. 

If the author of a cited work is unknown, the name of its editor should be used instead, e.g. 

Breniquet C., Michel C. (eds) 2014, Wool Economy in the Ancient Near East and the Aegean. From the Beginnings of Sheep Husbandry to Institutional Textile Industry, Ancient Textile Series 17, Oxford, Philadelphia. 

Alternatively, it is also allowed to make a custom abbreviation with added date of the publication and explain it in the reference list.

References to works by ancient authors should follow the rules of The Oxford Classical Dictionary (e.g. Liv. Epit. 70) and be explained individually in the reference list, if it is necessary to cite a specific edition of the work, e.g.

Vitr. De arch. 2002, Vitruvio Pollione, Architettura (dai libri I-VII), trad. S. Ferri, Milano. 

When referencing editions of historical sources, commentaries, encyclopediae, or dictionaries, abbreviations should be used as customary in a given research field (e.g. CIL XI 1147) and explained individually in the reference list.

Online publications should be cited just as the paper ones, except that their entries in the reference list should include the URL address and access date given in a parenthesis, e.g.

Frei, K.M. 2014, Provenance of archaeological wool textiles: new case studies, Open Journal of Archaeometry 2.1, 1–5 (http://doi.org/10.4081/arc.2014.5239, accessed 13 January 2018).

In justified cases it is allowed to create other additional abbreviations modelled closely on the aforementioned general rules for citations and expand them in the reference list.

All abbreviations and expressions in the footnotes and the reference list should follow the rules of the language of the cited work, e.g. in English: ed., fig., and tab. (singular), or eds, figs, and tabs (plural).


Rules for preparing the reference list

Titles of periodicals, monographs, joint publications, or encyclopediae should use italics with the place of publication given in its original version, whereas titles of series should use normal font, e.g.

Madyda-Legutko R.1987a, Die Gürtelschnallen der Römischen Kaiserzeit und der frühen Völkerwanderungszeit im mitteleuropäischen Barbaricum, British Archaeological Reports International Series 360, Oxford.

In the case of serial publications (periodicals and series) no abbreviations should be used in titles, and the original numeration of volumes should be preserved (Arabic or Roman), e.g.

Mårtensson L., Nosch M.-L., Andersson Strand E. 2009, Shape of things: understanding a loom weigh, Oxford Journal of Archaeology 28.4, 373–398.

Editors of joint publications should be listed before titles with the use of expressions and abbreviations consistent with the language of the cited publication, e.g.

Spantidaki Y., Moulherat Ch. 2012, Greece, in M. Gleba, U. Mannering (eds), Textiles and Textile Production in Europe: From Prehistory to AD 400, Ancient Textile Series 12, Oxford, Oakville, 185–200.

Publications should be cited according to their actual publication date indicated in the imprint, whereas entries in the reference list should include, for instance, the date of issue of a periodical placed after the number of the volume, e.g. 

Madyda-Legutko R. 1987b, Metalowe części pasów na obszarze kultury zachodniobałtyjskiej w okresie wpływów rzymskich, Wiadomości Archeologiczne XLVIII/1 (1983), 21–36.

In case of translated works, the name and surname of the translator should be included, whereas the original title or, optionally, place and date of the first edition should be given in square brackets.

Sartre M. 1997, Wschód rzymski. Prowincje i społeczeństwa prowincjonalne we wschodniej części basenu Morza Śródziemnego w okresie od Augusta do Sewerów (31 r. p.n.e.– 235 r. n.e.), tłum. S. Rościcki, Wrocław, Warszawa, Kraków [L’Orient romain, Paris 1991].

In case of transliteration of the Cyrillic script, the ISO 9 standard should be used (cf. e.g. https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_9). Similarly, in case of citing literature written in other alphabets, it is necessary to transliterate it into the Latin script.

THE PUBLISHING PROCESS

Submitted manuscripts are evaluated whether they comply with the scope of the journal and meet the standard of a scientific work. Correctness of text formatting as well as format of figures and tables are checked. At this stage, Editors can send back manuscripts and ask authors to apply technical improvements. The first decision (about acceptance into the reviewing process or rejection) is communicated to corresponding authors within 30 days since the submission.

Next, an accepted manuscript is reviewed by an independent reviewer who is an expert in the discussed subject and has no conflict of interest with the author(s). The review is double-blind, meaning that authors and reviewers remain anonymous to each other. The review is conducted using a standard protocol. Detailed remarks can be annotated in the text of the manuscript.

The reviewer has 30 days to evaluate the manuscript. When the review fails to meet the ethical standards of the journal, Editors are obligated to assign another reviewer.

After receiving the text of the review, and the answer of the author(s), Editors decide whether to accept the manuscript or reject it. In both cases, authors are informed about the decision.

Next, between 14 and 60 days are assigned to author(s) to improve the manuscript based on the comments of the reviewer(s). The best efforts are made to limit the editorial process to no more than six months.

A final version of the manuscript undergoes proof-reading and necessary edits to match the layout of the journal. After the proof-reading, each author receives the final version of the manuscript for approval together with a standard licence agreement. The manuscript cannot be published until the licence agreement is signed. Authors do not contribute financially to the publication process.

All manuscripts in the Światowit journal receive DOI numbers, and they are published on the official web page in Open Access. Next, the whole volume in printed. Each volume is published in the spring of the following year.